• Disclosure
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • CCPA
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Contact
  • About
Monday, June 27, 2022
Snohomish County News Now
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Technology
    • Crytpocurrency
    • Gaming
    • Gadgets
  • Sports
  • Health
  • General
    • Business Services
  • Travel
  • Press Releases
  • Popular
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Technology
    • Crytpocurrency
    • Gaming
    • Gadgets
  • Sports
  • Health
  • General
    • Business Services
  • Travel
  • Press Releases
  • Popular
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Technology Gaming

Asus ROG Flow Z13 In Review: Gaming Tablet With Powerful Alder Lake I9 CPU – Notebookcheck.net

asus-rog-flow-z13-in-review:-gaming-tablet-with-powerful-alder-lake-i9-cpu-–-notebookcheck.net
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Gaming on the go. With the new ROG Flow Z13, Asus introduces a gaming tablet that combines a brand-new Alder Lake Core i9 processor with the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti. It also comes with a fast 120 Hz panel and the option to connect an external GPU.

Andreas Osthoff, ? Andreas Osthoff (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 03/01/2022 ??

csm flow Z13 intro2 90b87800fc

Asus refers to the new ROG Flow Z13 as the most powerful gaming tablet on the market, and a look at the spec sheet definitely supports this statement. Our review sample is equipped with a brand-new Intel Alder Lake Core i9 CPU, a dedicated Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti, and 16 GB of LPDDR5-5200 RAM. In order to be able to make reasonable use of the components’ performance, the manufacturer has implemented vapor-chamber cooling as well as liquid metal on the processor for improved heat transfer. In addition, there’s a 13.4-inch 16:10 display with a resolution of 1,920×1,200 pixels, a 120 Hz refresh rate, and G-Sync.

Optionally, there are other models with weaker i7 or i5 CPUs, as well as the normal RTX 3050 or even just the integrated Xe Graphics of the Alder Lake processor. This configuration with the iGPU could definitely be interesting if you don’t want to game while on the go, but want to use the external XG Mobile eGPU (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 or AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT) at home. Our test configuration is available for around 2,100 Euros (~$2,367). There aren’t many immediate rivals for the ROG Flow Z13, which is why we also resort to normal laptops with similar components as comparison devices.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer (AUS/NZL based) – Details here

German-English-Translator – Details here (English native speakers preferred)

Processor

Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 – 5 GHz, 114 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P

Memory

16384 MB 

, LPDDR5-5200, dual-channel, onboard

Display

13.40 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 169 PPI, capacitive, LQ134N1JW54, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen, HDR, 120 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK, 1024 GB 

, 875 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH – cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 12 x 302 x 204 ( = 0.47 x 11.89 x 8.03 in)

Battery

56 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 100-watt PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.185 kg ( = 41.8 oz / 2.61 pounds), Power Supply: 407 g ( = 14.36 oz / 0.9 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

, , , , , ,

search relation.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

In general, the ROG Flow Z13 is a normal convertible with an integrated kickstand and an attachable keyboard, just like we’ve seen in the Microsoft Surface Pro for years. However, the Flow Z13 is considerably more massive and heavier. Nevertheless, due to the higher weight, the convertible also looks very premium, and this impression is supported by both the stability and workmanship of the aluminum case. The integrated kickstand, which allows a maximum opening angle of up to 170 degrees, also looks quite high quality. Although the material is very thin here, it doesn’t bend when you change the angle. The two hinges are very well adjusted in principle, and there’s only a minimum degree of play. Both the volume rocker and the power button (including the fingerprint scanner) are neatly integrated into the case.

Window with lighting at the back
Window with lighting at the back

The aggressive design language is in line with the ROG laptops, and it also suits a gaming tablet. There’s also a small window in the case on the back, which can be illuminated and also supports Aura Sync technology (just like the keyboard backlight). However, this also creates a small hump, which is why the tablet is unable to lay flat on its back and wobbles. The fan grilles on the back have also been implemented as design elements, so they are hardly noticeable. There’s a large Republic of Gamers logo on the top, which is flanked by the two fan outlets.

The included keyboard cover also doubles as a cover and protects the display when the device is not in use. The back of the cover has some sort of velour finish, which feels nice to the touch and provides a good grip, but also picks up dust and dirt very quickly.

Top 10 Laptops

Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks

under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays

Top 10 Smartphones

Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones

csm IMG 3665 23f4247ebe

Weighing in at 1.185 kg, the ROG Flow Z13 alone already weighs more than many ultrabooks, such as the Schenker Vision 14 with the RTX 3050 Ti. With the keyboard cover, the weight climbs to a bit more than 1.5 kg, and the package is also almost 2 cm thick. Of course, this still makes it very portable, but you can clearly notice the difference to weaker convertibles like the Surface Pro 8. The 100-watt power adapter adds a bit over 400 grams to the weight.

, , , , , ,

search relation.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

{element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_325060’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_323568’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_323568’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_327280’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_327280’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_320914’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_320914’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_328012’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_328012’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_325824’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_325824’).checked = false;return false;” title=”hide all”>❌

324 mm / 12.8 inch222 mm / 8.74 inch19.9 mm / 0.783 inch1.7 kg3.84 lbs319.7 mm / 12.6 inch220 mm / 8.66 inch16.8 mm / 0.661 inch1.8 kg3.9 lbs308.8 mm / 12.2 inch215 mm / 8.46 inch15.6 mm / 0.614 inch1.1 kg2.48 lbs299 mm / 11.8 inch222 mm / 8.74 inch15.8 mm / 0.622 inch1.4 kg3 lbs302 mm / 11.9 inch204 mm / 8.03 inch12 mm / 0.4724 inch1.2 kg2.61 lbs292 mm / 11.5 inch201 mm / 7.91 inch8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch891 g1.964 lbs

The port for the external XG Mobile GPU is located behind a rubber cover.
The port for the external XG Mobile GPU is located behind a rubber cover.

Considering it’s a tablet, the available ports are not bad at all. On the left side, there’s a USB-C port including Thunderbolt 4 support, as well as the connection for an external graphics card behind a small cover that consists of a USB-C port and a proprietary port with 8 PCIe lanes. A microSD reader and a regular USB-A port are on the right side. However, the latter only supports the outdated USB 2.0 standard, which is somewhat hard to understand.

We had problems with the Thunderbolt 4 port in our review sample because we were unable to charge the device via this port, regardless of whether we used the included power adapter or other USB-C power adapters. The operating system only displayed a notification saying that the device was not charging and that the included power adapter should be used. After some research, we discovered that the Thunderbolt 4 port doesn’t support charging in German models. We were very surprised about that, because the charging function is actually mandatory for the Thunderbolt 4 certification. We have contacted Asus about this and will update this article accordingly as soon as we receive official feedback.

The microSD slot at the back.
The microSD slot at the back.

There’s a small microSD card reader on the back behind the kickstand, and it’s able to fully accommodate memory cards. The card reader is very fast, and we were able to determine a very high maximum transfer rate of over 260 MB/s with our reference card (Angelbird AV Pro V60). This puts the Flow Z13 firmly at the top of the comparison field. Performance was a bit lower when copying data, but the result of over 100 MB/s is still decent.

Asus integrates a cutting-edge Wi-Fi 6E module from Intel (AX210E), which supports all modern standards including Bluetooth 5.2. Wi-Fi 6E is still a bit problematic in Europe, and you can only get it to work with tricks at the moment, but at least you’re optimally equipped for the next few years. The transfer rates in connection with our reference router (Netgear AX12) are very good, and we didn’t notice any problems with signal quality during testing, neither with the Wi-Fi 6 router nor with a FritzBox 7490 (Wi-Fi 5). However, there’s no integrated LTE or 5G modem available.

05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip

; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (853-1480)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1418 (776-1663)

The ROG Flow Z13 is equipped with two cameras. An 8 MP sensor is found on the back, which can be used to take very decent pictures as long as the exposure is right. Only the 720p sensor (0.9 MP) is available on the front, but the pictures are comparatively good. Of course, there’s still much room for improvement here, but we’ve also seen much worse 720p cameras.

Test chart with the rear-facing camera
Test chart with the rear-facing camera
ColorChecker

12.3 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

9.2 ∆E

8.6 ∆E

10.3 ∆E

6.5 ∆E

7.6 ∆E

8.1 ∆E

12.4 ∆E

4.6 ∆E

4.6 ∆E

6 ∆E

8.5 ∆E

1.9 ∆E

11.9 ∆E

2.2 ∆E

9.8 ∆E

5.8 ∆E

5.6 ∆E

2.4 ∆E

3.4 ∆E

2.5 ∆E

4.4 ∆E

3.3 ∆E

ColorChecker Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE: 6.63 ∆E min: 1.92 – max: 12.43 ∆E

Asus ships the ROG Flow Z13 with the keyboard cover by default, but there are otherwise no other accessories included in the attractive packaging. Of course, the XG Mobile eGPU is optionally available, and we already had the chance to test it in combination with the ROG Flow X13. In addition, there’s the Asus Pen and various input devices as well as headsets with the ROG branding.

The ROG Flow Z13’s case can’t be opened by the user, and almost every component is soldered as well. However, there’s at least a small maintenance hatch on the back with access to the M.2-2230 SSD that can be replaced. But more on that in the storage section.

The ROG Flow Z13 comes with a keyboard cover that uses Pogo pins to magnetically attach to the bottom of the tablet as well as to be powered. As with the Surface Pro, the keyboard can be used either flat or at a slight angle (see pictures). The problem here is that the keyboard’s material retains the angle a bit, so that the keyboard is slightly lifted from the surface and yields when typing, for example, when you want to use it again in its flat form on a table. This affects typing stability a bit, but that is the norm for such keyboard covers.

The mechanics of the keys themselves are decent, though. The key travel isn’t too short (1.7 mm), and several keystrokes are registered simultaneously (N-key rollover). In practice, however, you almost always need to work with the keyboard backlight activated (RGB, one zone, supports Aura Sync), since the contrast between the dark keys and their labels is just not optimal. The keyboard offers the German QWERTZ layout, but some compromises like the single-line Enter key or the small arrow keys have been necessary to achieve this.

The small ClickPad (9.8 x 5.6 cm) offers good gliding properties, and mouse control is also possible without issues, but the small surface is not particularly suitable for gestures. The pad can also be pressed down in the lower area, but this is met with a very loud and cheap-sounding click noise. However, we presume that most users will use an external mouse anyway, especially when gaming. Furthermore, the capacitive touchscreen is still available for everyday use, and it works very well.

Asus offers two different 13.4-inch IPS touchscreens in a 16:10 aspect ratio for the ROG Flow Z13. Besides a 4K display (3,840×2,400 pixels, WQUXGA, 60 Hz, 450 nits, P3 color space), you can also choose the Full HD panel (1,920×1,200 pixels, WUXGA), which only covers the smaller sRGB color space but has a slightly higher brightness (500 nits) and a higher refresh rate of 120 Hz. The Full HD resolution also suits the RTX 3050 Ti better, so overall, we think the Full HD panel is a better fit for the gaming tablet.

The subjective image impression is very good, and everything looks very sharp, even at the lower Full HD resolution. Colors also look rich and high-contrast, something that is confirmed by our measurements as well. The maximum brightness is around 515 cd/m² at the center of the screen, but it’s “only” 476 cd/m² on average. The black level is slightly elevated at 0.35 cd/m², but this still adds up to a very good contrast ratio of almost 1,500:1. Response times show no issues, and even at full brightness, screen bleeding isn’t a problem.

500

cd/m²
490

cd/m²
479

cd/m²
476

cd/m²
515

cd/m²
446

cd/m²
460

cd/m²
463

cd/m²
459

cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LQ134N1JW54

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 515 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 476.4 cd/m² Minimum: 27.8 cd/m²

Brightness Distribution: 87 %

Center on Battery: 515 cd/m²

Contrast: 1471:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)

ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 1.2

ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7

69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)

97.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)

67.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)

Gamma: 2.2

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

LQ134N1JW54, IPS, 1920×1200, 13.40
Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

MNE007ZA1, IPS, 2880×1800, 14.00
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

TL140BDXP01-0, IPS, 2560×1440, 14.00
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

LP129WT212166, IPS, 2880×1920, 13.00
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

TL140BDXP02-2, IPS, 2560×1440, 14.00
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

LQ134R1JW51, IPS, 3840×2400, 13.40
Display P3 Coverage

67.5

74.3

10%

94.24

40%

78.2

16%

97.2

44%

77.78

15%

sRGB Coverage

97.1

97.6

1%

99.91

3%

100

3%

99.9

3%

99.48

2%

AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage

69.3

75.7

9%

84.52

22%

77.6

12%

85.4

23%

76.75

11%

Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *

44 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(22, 22)

40.4 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(18.8, 21.6)

8%

20 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(11, 9)

55%

46.4 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(22.8, 23.6)

-5%

16.4 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(8, 8.4)

63%

48 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(23, 25)

-9%

Response Time Black / White *

17.6 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(6, 11.6)

18.4 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(6, 12.4)

-5%

6 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(2, 4)

66%

23.2 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(10.8, 12.4)

-32%

10.8 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(5.6, 5.2)

39%

32 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(16, 16)

-82%

PWM Frequency

29760 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(50)

Brightness middle

515

407

-21%

333

-35%

444

-14%

331.1

-36%

359

-30%

Brightness

476

407

-14%

317

-33%

451

-5%

318

-33%

331

-30%

Brightness Distribution

87

94

8%

89

2%

91

5%

91

5%

86

-1%

Black Level *

0.35

0.25

29%

0.36

-3%

0.43

-23%

0.36

-3%

0.23

34%

Contrast

1471

1628

11%

925

-37%

1033

-30%

920

-37%

1561

6%

Colorchecker dE 2000 *

1.6

2.6

-63%

5.58

-249%

2

-25%

2.25

-41%

2.46

-54%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

4

4.4

-10%

10.62

-166%

3.2

20%

4.62

-16%

3.85

4%

Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *

1.2

2

-67%

2.88

-140%

1.7

-42%

1.6

-33%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

2.5

2.7

-8%

7.5

-200%

1.8

28%

1.7

32%

1.89

24%

Gamma

2.2 100%

2.18 101%

2.28 96%

2.11 104%

2.3 96%

2.38 92%

CCT

6939 94%

6316 103%

7220 90%

6417 101%

6751 96%

6835 95%

Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)

68.2

Color Space (Percent of sRGB)

99.4

* … smaller is better

The default refresh rate is 120 Hz when the device is plugged in, but it automatically switches to 60 Hz on battery power. As a result, the screen goes black for about one second when the power adapter is plugged in or unplugged. This can be modified in the Armoury Crate software, where there is an option called “Energy-saving panel”. As soon as you deactivate it, the frequency stays at 120 Hz even on battery power. In everyday use, the 120 Hz mode mainly leads to a smoother image impression when scrolling through documents or websites, and it can also be beneficial when gaming.

We analyzed the display with the professional CalMAN software and the X-Rite i1 Pro 2 spectrophotometer. Out of the box, we notice a slight color tint in grayscales towards green/blue in combination with a slightly too cool color temperature. This doesn’t play a major role in everyday use, and you can only recognize it with the naked eye if you work with calibrated displays otherwise. Manufacturers like to use this trick to increase the maximum brightness a bit. Consequently, our calibrated profile (available for free download above) also results in a reduction of the maximum brightness from 515 to 480 cd/m². However, since both the color and grayscale deviations are already very good out of the box, calibration isn’t strictly necessary. The Full HD display covers the sRGB color space almost completely, which makes it suitable for editing pictures/videos.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected
csm pwm 8962b0db46

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 22420 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The brightness is very high, and it’s not reduced on battery power. Nonetheless, reflections are quickly visible on the glossy touchscreen. Especially in very bright environments, content visibility becomes limited as a result. But it should be possible to use the device comfortably in the shade or on cloudy days provided that it’s positioned appropriately. The IPS panel offers very stable viewing angles with no color shifts or strong contrast losses.

Our review configuration represents the most powerful model of the ROG Flow Z13 and is powered by the new Alder Lake Core i9-12900H  in combination with the dedicated GeForce RTX 3050 Ti, which runs at a maximum of 40 watts (35 watts + 5 watts Dynamic Boost coming from the processor). The package is rounded off by 16 GB of LPDDR5-5200 RAM (dual-channel), and there are currently no models with 32 GB of RAM. We have listed the three base models below, but they can still differ in terms of memory configuration and the built-in display:

Model GZ301ZE GZ301ZC GZ301ZA
CPU Core i9-12900H Core i7-12700H Core i5-12500H
GPU GeForce RTX 3050 Ti (40 watts) GeForce RTX 3050 (40 watts) Iris Xe Graphics
RAM 16 GB LPDDR5 16 GB LPDDR5 16 GB LPDDR5

Installing such a powerful Core i9 CPU in a compact gaming tablet doesn’t exactly seem very reasonable to us, especially in combination with the slowest variant of the RTX 3050 Ti. There’s certainly a slight imbalance here, and the Core i7 CPU is unlikely to run noticeably slower in the ROG Flow Z13 (same number of cores, but lower Turbo frequency).

csm hwinfo 93965cb3b3
Armoury Crate
Armoury Crate

It’s not so easy to find the right test settings, because besides the normal Windows settings, there is also a range of additional energy settings in the preinstalled Armoury Crate software, which also override the Windows energy-saving plan anyway. In addition, there’s also the option to completely disable the integrated GPU via the MUX switch, but this requires a reboot. Furthermore, there are various settings for the hybrid graphics. For example, you can configure the dedicated GPU to only be used when the device is plugged in. All in all, there are so many options to adjust the device to your needs, but there’s also the risk of getting a bit confused and possibly not using the optimal settings.

We tried all the reasonable combinations and were able to get the best results (somewhat surprisingly) with the regular Windows “Balanced” power plan along with the Windows setting in the Armoury Crate software and the Windows performance slider set to “Best Performance”. There might still be updates, but we currently don’t see any advantage in the additional energy profiles.

The new Core i9-12900H from Intel’s Alder Lake lineup (12th generation) is one of the fastest mobile chips available on the market today, and it offers a total of 14 cores (6 performance cores with Hyper-Threading and 8 efficiency cores) with 20 threads as well as a maximum clock rate of up to 5.0 GHz. You would probably expect such a CPU in high-end gaming laptops and certainly not in a compact gaming tablet. The nominal TDP is still 45 watts, but Asus hasn’t limited consumption in practice, and we see consumptions of up to 114 watts (!!!) in the first 30 seconds of multi-core tests, after which consumption levels off at 55 watts. This means that during short load peaks in particular (and also in many benchmarks), the ROG Flow Z13 offers an excellent performance. However, the tablet always uses the internal battery for a brief moment because, as we will see later, the power adapter is only able to supply a maximum of 103 watts.

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip

Consequently, the review sample is actually always at the top of the comparison field in the CPU benchmarks. In the Cinebench loop, you can clearly see that power consumption has already settled at 55 watts in the third run, so performance is more than 20% lower compared to the first run. Nevertheless, the Intel chip is still competitive with 55 watts, and it performs on par with the current Ryzen 9 5000 chips found in the Asus Zephyrus G14 or the Razer Blade 14, which are operated at 75 and 80 watts, respectively, in those devices. The current Tiger Lake H35 chips, which are still used in many compact laptops at the moment, have absolutely no chances here with their 4 cores.

The high continuous consumption of 55 watts is also good news for users of the XG Mobile eGPU, since this means that the CPU will not become a bottleneck. However, power consumption is significantly limited to 30 watts on battery power, but this still enables very good benchmark results. Nevertheless, it has to be said clearly that the Core i7-12700H (same number of cores, slightly lower clock rate) would have achieved almost the same performance in this case (especially as soon as the 55-watt limit kicks in), and that the Core i9 wouldn’t provide a noticeable advantage. Additional benchmarks are available in our respective CPU Benchmarks article.

CPU data during the Cinebench R15 Multi loop
CPU data during the Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

60567

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

13558

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

9498

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

32.77 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

169.3 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

3.3 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

275 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

221 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2779 Points

Help

The ROG Flow Z13 is a very powerful system, and this is also confirmed by the good benchmark results. However, we experienced minor stutters from time to time during testing, such as when opening the Windows settings. We don’t know the reason for this yet, but it doesn’t seem to be a problem with the graphics-switching function. It might have something to do with the Armoury Crate software, or possibly with the new hybrid structure of the processor cores. Nevertheless, the stutters only occurred very rarely in our test and weren’t really a problem because of this. Otherwise, the subjective performance impression is very good as well.

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

6967 Points ∼100% +10%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

6617 Points ∼95% +4%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

6335 Points ∼91%

Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

 

6335 Points ∼91% 0%

Average of class Gaming

  (4077 – 8007, n=175, last 2 years)

6294 Points ∼90% -1%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

5971 Points ∼86% -6%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

5838 Points ∼84% -8%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

5041 Points ∼72% -20%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

10755 Points ∼100%

Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

 

10755 Points ∼100% 0%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

10413 Points ∼97% -3%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

10094 Points ∼94% -6%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

9758 Points ∼91% -9%

Average of class Gaming

  (7148 – 11064, n=174, last 2 years)

9740 Points ∼91% -9%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

9689 Points ∼90% -10%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

9234 Points ∼86% -14%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

9785 Points ∼100%

Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

 

9785 Points ∼100% 0%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

9458 Points ∼97% -3%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

9381 Points ∼96% -4%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

8806 Points ∼90% -10%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

8653 Points ∼88% -12%

Average of class Gaming

  (6732 – 10141, n=174, last 2 years)

8492 Points ∼87% -13%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

6537 Points ∼67% -33%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

9395 Points ∼100% +43%

Average of class Gaming

  (3670 – 12905, n=174, last 2 years)

8307 Points ∼88% +27%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

8236 Points ∼88% +26%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

6844 Points ∼73% +4%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

6641 Points ∼71% +1%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

6556 Points ∼70%

Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

 

6556 Points ∼70% 0%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

5488 Points ∼58% -16%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

2108 Points ∼100%

Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

 

2108 Points ∼100% 0%

Average of class Gaming

  (1302 – 2108, n=7, last 2 years)

1530 Points ∼73% -27%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

1502 Points ∼71% -29%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

1394 Points ∼66% -34%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

2033 Points ∼100%

Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

 

2033 Points ∼100% 0%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

1555 Points ∼76% -24%

Average of class Gaming

  (1284 – 2033, n=7, last 2 years)

1509 Points ∼74% -26%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

1389 Points ∼68% -32%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

2165 Points ∼100%

Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

 

2165 Points ∼100% 0%

Average of class Gaming

  (1372 – 2165, n=7, last 2 years)

1595 Points ∼74% -26%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

1513 Points ∼70% -30%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

1452 Points ∼67% -33%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

2168 Points ∼100%

Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

 

2168 Points ∼100% 0%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

1501 Points ∼69% -31%

Average of class Gaming

  (1116 – 2168, n=7, last 2 years)

1417 Points ∼65% -35%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

1103 Points ∼51% -49%

PCMark 10 Score 6335 points

Help

In our standardized latency test (web browsing, YouTube 4K playback, CPU load), the Flow Z13 exhibits elevated latencies. Therefore, the gaming tablet is only suitable for using real-time audio software to a limited extent with the current BIOS version.

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

3927.1 μs * ∼100% -166%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

1473.8 μs * ∼38%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

1052 μs * ∼27% +29%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

1048 μs * ∼27% +29%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

489 μs * ∼12% +67%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

392.6 μs * ∼10% +73%

* … smaller is better

The compact M.2-2230 SSD can be replaced.
The compact M.2-2230 SSD can be replaced.

Asus has chosen to use a compact M.2-2230 SSD, which is also very easy to access through the small hatch on the back. Despite the small size, this is a PCIe 4.0 SSD, which comes from Micron in our case and offers a storage capacity of 1 TB. 875 GB of this is still available after the first boot. The benchmark results are by no means bad, and there are no issues in everyday use or gaming, but the maximum sequential transfer rates are more in line with fast PCIe 3.0 x4 drives. In exchange, the Micron SSD delivers a very good performance in the 4K tests. Further SSD benchmarks are available here.

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3341.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3222 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 780.43 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 621.36 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 72.07 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 340.18 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2063.41 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1569.77 MB/s

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

4315 (4271.27min – 4314.68max) MB/s ∼100% +92%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

2425 (2418.63min – 2424.52max) MB/s ∼56% +8%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

2252 (2241.23min – 2252.02max) MB/s ∼52%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

2252 MB/s ∼52% 0%

Average of class Gaming

  (170 – 4645, n=170, last 2 years)

2071 MB/s ∼48% -8%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

1905 (1898.32min – 1905.05max) MB/s ∼44% -15%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

1853 (1835.11min – 1853.11max) MB/s ∼43% -18%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

1770 (1735.81min – 1770.42max) MB/s ∼41% -21%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

4326 (4303.78min – 4326.21max) MB/s ∼100% +34%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

3217 (2128.61min – 3217.03max) MB/s ∼74%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

3217 MB/s ∼74% 0%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

2957 (2951.32min – 2957.19max) MB/s ∼68% -8%

Average of class Gaming

  (174 – 4574, n=169, last 2 years)

2208 MB/s ∼51% -31%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

1958 (1939.66min – 1957.55max) MB/s ∼45% -39%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

1638 (1632.72min – 1638.16max) MB/s ∼38% -49%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

1324 (1199.03min – 1323.72max) MB/s ∼31% -59%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

6701 (6057.41min – 6701.03max) MB/s ∼100% +100%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

3395 (2336.65min – 3395.42max) MB/s ∼51% +1%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

3345 (2561.25min – 3345.4max) MB/s ∼50%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

3345 MB/s ∼50% 0%

Average of class Gaming

  (144 – 7090, n=170, last 2 years)

3309 MB/s ∼49% -1%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

3130 (2702.81min – 3130.03max) MB/s ∼47% -6%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

2450 (2327.38min – 2449.89max) MB/s ∼37% -27%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

2260 (1924min – 2259.89max) MB/s ∼34% -32%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

4955 (4937.74min – 4955.15max) MB/s ∼100% +54%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

3215 (3201.61min – 3214.59max) MB/s ∼65%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

3215 MB/s ∼65% 0%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

2994 (2986.03min – 2994.1max) MB/s ∼60% -7%

Average of class Gaming

  (155 – 5969, n=170, last 2 years)

2641 MB/s ∼53% -18%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

1982 (1958.18min – 1981.83max) MB/s ∼40% -38%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

1703 (1685.67min – 1702.84max) MB/s ∼34% -47%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

1588 (1424.3min – 1588.17max) MB/s ∼32% -51%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

94.2 (93.47min – 94.2max) MB/s ∼100% +40%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

67.4 (65.12min – 67.38max) MB/s ∼72%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

67.4 MB/s ∼72% 0%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

55.7 (54.81min – 55.71max) MB/s ∼59% -17%

Average of class Gaming

  (0.53 – 137, n=170, last 2 years)

51.7 MB/s ∼55% -23%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

48.4 (44.27min – 48.4max) MB/s ∼51% -28%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

46.3 (46.19min – 46.3max) MB/s ∼49% -31%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

43.4 (42.72min – 43.38max) MB/s ∼46% -36%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

391 (388.2min – 391max) MB/s ∼100%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

391 MB/s ∼100% 0%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

247 (244.59min – 247.11max) MB/s ∼63% -37%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

168 (152.94min – 168.15max) MB/s ∼43% -57%

Average of class Gaming

  (0.79 – 408, n=169, last 2 years)

150 MB/s ∼38% -62%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

139 (135.15min – 138.9max) MB/s ∼36% -64%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

124 (123.62min – 124.21max) MB/s ∼32% -68%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

114 (112.22min – 114.22max) MB/s ∼29% -71%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

3297 (3266.49min – 3297.01max) MB/s ∼100% +79%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

1897 (1895.38min – 1897.45max) MB/s ∼58% +3%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

1846 (1842.83min – 1846max) MB/s ∼56%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

1846 MB/s ∼56% 0%

Average of class Gaming

  (1.1 – 4198, n=169, last 2 years)

1550 MB/s ∼47% -16%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

1294 (1280.16min – 1293.7max) MB/s ∼39% -30%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

1249 (1220.11min – 1248.59max) MB/s ∼38% -32%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

805 (800.4min – 804.86max) MB/s ∼24% -56%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

2751 (2683.65min – 2751.16max) MB/s ∼100%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

2751 MB/s ∼100% 0%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

2154 (2150min – 2154.41max) MB/s ∼78% -22%

Average of class Gaming

  (1.15 – 4249, n=169, last 2 years)

1594 MB/s ∼58% -42%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

964 (961.85min – 964.1max) MB/s ∼35% -65%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

571 (564.67min – 570.64max) MB/s ∼21% -79%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

505 (497.69min – 504.92max) MB/s ∼18% -82%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

384 (378.78min – 383.65max) MB/s ∼14% -86%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

7472 Points ∼100%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

7472 Points ∼100% 0%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

6095 Points ∼82% -18%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

5763 Points ∼77% -23%

Average of class Gaming

  (910 – 9134, n=165, last 2 years)

4680 Points ∼63% -37%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

3700 Points ∼50% -50%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

3464 Points ∼46% -54%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

2566 Points ∼34% -66%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

2920 Points ∼100% +13%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

2592 Points ∼89%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

2592 Points ∼89% 0%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

2449 Points ∼84% -6%

Average of class Gaming

  (389 – 3587, n=165, last 2 years)

1738 Points ∼60% -33%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

1598 Points ∼55% -38%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

1275 Points ∼44% -51%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

1184 Points ∼41% -54%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

3541 Points ∼100%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

3541 Points ∼100% 0%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

2410 Points ∼68% -32%

Average of class Gaming

  (335 – 4414, n=165, last 2 years)

2062 Points ∼58% -42%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

1805 Points ∼51% -49%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

1412 Points ∼40% -60%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

1121 Points ∼32% -68%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

818 Points ∼23% -77%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

5367 MB/s ∼100% +85%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

3066.19 MB/s ∼57% +6%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

2903 MB/s ∼54%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

2903 MB/s ∼54% 0%

Average of class Gaming

  (252 – 5739, n=165, last 2 years)

2745 MB/s ∼51% -5%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

2618 MB/s ∼49% -10%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

2137.4 MB/s ∼40% -26%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

1972 MB/s ∼37% -32%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

3955 MB/s ∼100% +37%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

2886 MB/s ∼73%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

2886 MB/s ∼73% 0%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

2805.31 MB/s ∼71% -3%

Average of class Gaming

  (308 – 5210, n=165, last 2 years)

2209 MB/s ∼56% -23%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

1333.6 MB/s ∼34% -54%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

1157 MB/s ∼29% -60%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

856 MB/s ∼22% -70%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

88.7 MB/s ∼100% 0%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

88.67 MB/s ∼100%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

83.61 MB/s ∼94% -6%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

56.74 MB/s ∼64% -36%

Average of class Gaming

  (20 – 88.7, n=165, last 2 years)

51 MB/s ∼57% -42%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

49.8 MB/s ∼56% -44%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

45.37 MB/s ∼51% -49%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

38.32 MB/s ∼43% -57%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

335 MB/s ∼100% 0%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

334.65 MB/s ∼100%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

205.25 MB/s ∼61% -39%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

179.26 MB/s ∼54% -46%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

176.37 MB/s ∼53% -47%

Average of class Gaming

  (18 – 352, n=165, last 2 years)

133 MB/s ∼40% -60%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

119.68 MB/s ∼36% -64%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

96.36 MB/s ∼29% -71%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

2299.71 MB/s ∼100% +4%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

2213 MB/s ∼96% 0%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

2212.95 MB/s ∼96%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

2092.8 MB/s ∼91% -5%

Average of class Gaming

  (216 – 2959, n=165, last 2 years)

1413 MB/s ∼61% -36%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

1297.66 MB/s ∼56% -41%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

1015.87 MB/s ∼44% -54%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

929.5 MB/s ∼40% -58%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

2917.48 MB/s ∼100%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

2917 MB/s ∼100% 0%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

2009.36 MB/s ∼69% -31%

Average of class Gaming

  (192 – 3859, n=165, last 2 years)

1718 MB/s ∼59% -41%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

1492.16 MB/s ∼51% -49%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

908.98 MB/s ∼31% -69%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

811.04 MB/s ∼28% -72%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

556.51 MB/s ∼19% -81%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

0.112 ms * ∼100% -300%

Average of class Gaming

  (0.018 – 0.23, n=158, last 2 years)

0.068 ms * ∼61% -143%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

0.046 ms * ∼41% -64%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

0.036 ms * ∼32% -29%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

0.033 ms * ∼29% -18%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

0.028 ms * ∼25%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

0.028 ms * ∼25% -0%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

0.024 ms * ∼21% +14%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

0.182 ms * ∼100%

Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK

 

0.182 ms * ∼100% -0%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe

0.156 ms * ∼86% +14%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

0.086 ms * ∼47% +53%

Average of class Gaming

  (0.012 – 0.588, n=165, last 2 years)

0.072 ms * ∼40% +60%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00

0.043 ms * ∼24% +76%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB

0.04 ms * ∼22% +78%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW

0.02 ms * ∼11% +89%

* … smaller is better

017034051068085010201190136015301700187020402210238025502720289030603230Tooltip

: Ø3355 (3155.77-3367.61)

GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

In everyday use, the processor’s efficient Iris Xe Graphics G7 often takes care of graphics processing. This is the version with 96 EUs, with which we are already familiar from the Core i7 CPUs of the previous Tiger Lake U generation (e.g. Core i7-1165G7). For more demanding applications, such as games, the dedicated Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti is automatically enabled by the Optimus technology. As we mentioned before, this is the slowest version of the RTX 3050 Ti with a TGP of only 35 watts, where the processor can still provide 5 watts depending on the usage thanks to Dynamic Boost. We observed a maximum core clock rate of 1,297 MHz in the benchmarks, and there’s 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM available.

The synthetic benchmarks again show that this is one of the slowest versions of the RTX 3050 Ti, since the ROG Flow Z13 is about 20% behind the average results available in our database for the RTX 3050 Ti. However, performance remains stable under prolonged load, and the 3DMark Time Spy stress test is completed with 97%. On battery power, consumption is initially limited to 35 watts. When the battery level drops below 50%, the maximum is still 26 watts. Additional GPU benchmarks are available here.

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

33833 Points ∼100% +143%

Average of class Gaming

  (1925 – 45050, n=189, last 2 years)

27928 Points ∼83% +100%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

19866 Points ∼59% +43%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (13939 – 20905, n=11)

18109 Points ∼54% +30%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H

16128 Points ∼48% +16%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H

13939 Points ∼41%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS

10852 Points ∼32% -22%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7

6825 Points ∼20% -51%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

9768 Points ∼100% +142%

Average of class Gaming

  (429 – 13324, n=208, last 2 years)

8023 Points ∼82% +99%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

5748 Points ∼59% +42%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (4041 – 6122, n=12)

5250 Points ∼54% +30%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H

4721 Points ∼48% +17%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H

4041 Points ∼41%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7

1666 Points ∼17% -59%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

23373 Points ∼100% +121%

Average of class Gaming

  (1360 – 34993, n=204, last 2 years)

20959 Points ∼90% +98%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

14262 Points ∼61% +35%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (10288 – 14815, n=11)

13145 Points ∼56% +24%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H

11055 Points ∼47% +4%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H

10600 Points ∼45%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS

8396 Points ∼36% -21%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7

5570 Points ∼24% -47%

3DMark 11 Performance
14864 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9794 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4530 points

Help

Thanks to the built-in MUX switch, the integrated graphics card can be completely disabled, which can lead to improved latency and higher gaming performance. However, we were unable to detect a performance gain in our tests, regardless of whether we ran the synthetic 3DMarks or the gaming tests. This is certainly something you can experiment with a bit, but in general, we would recommend simply leaving the hybrid graphics enabled since Nvidia’s Optimus technology works very well.

The gaming performance of the RTX 3050 Ti is often only sufficient for medium details in modern games, but at least less demanding or older games are often playable at high details. We reviewed the external XG Mobile eGPU last year in combination with the ROG Flow X13, but you should then preferably play on an external display because performance will otherwise suffer. In any case, the 150-watt version of the mobile GeForce RTX 3080 offers a substantial performance boost.

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

164.2 (155min) fps ∼100% +122%

Average of class Gaming

  (60 – 247, n=154, last 2 years)

145 fps ∼88% +96%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

101 (20.4min, 59.3P0.1, 77.6P1) fps ∼62% +36%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (70 – 104, n=11)

92.3 fps ∼56% +25%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

74 fps ∼45%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

73 fps ∼44% -1%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

56.3 (51min) fps ∼34% -24%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

35 fps ∼21% -53%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

88.6 (79min) fps ∼100% +139%

Average of class Gaming

  (34.7 – 126, n=199, last 2 years)

80.5 fps ∼91% +117%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

53 (48.6min, 56.6P0.1, 76P1) fps ∼60% +43%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (34.3 – 58.4, n=15)

46.8 fps ∼53% +26%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

41.4 (39min, 40P1) fps ∼47% +12%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

37.1 (34min, 35P1) fps ∼42%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

37 fps ∼42% 0%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

33 (30min) fps ∼37% -11%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

14.7 (13min, 13.99P1) fps ∼17% -60%

Average of class Gaming

  (13 – 155, n=83, last 2 years)

108 fps ∼100% +66%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

105 (84min) fps ∼97% +62%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (64 – 94, n=8)

79.8 fps ∼74% +23%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

65 fps ∼60%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

64 fps ∼59% -2%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

28 fps ∼26% -57%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

22 (20min) fps ∼20% -66%

Average of class Gaming

  (12 – 146, n=108, last 2 years)

101 fps ∼100% +71%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

99 (74min) fps ∼98% +68%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (59 – 89, n=8)

74 fps ∼73% +25%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

59 fps ∼58% 0%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

59 fps ∼58%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

26 fps ∼26% -56%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

21 (19min) fps ∼21% -64%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

151 (132.8min) fps ∼100%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (111 – 154, n=12)

130 fps ∼86% -14%

Average of class Gaming

  (23.8 – 178, n=184, last 2 years)

126 fps ∼83% -17%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

121.4 (107.6min) fps ∼80% -20%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

117 (101.4min) fps ∼77% -23%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

112 (97min) fps ∼74% -26%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

110.8 (98.3min) fps ∼73% -27%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

63.4 (35.7min) fps ∼42% -58%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

137 (116.9min) fps ∼100%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (107 – 145, n=12)

122 fps ∼89% -11%

Average of class Gaming

  (22 – 159, n=183, last 2 years)

119 fps ∼87% -13%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

116 (101.7min) fps ∼85% -15%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

113 (95.5min) fps ∼82% -18%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

107 (92.7min) fps ∼78% -22%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

105.6 (92.7min) fps ∼77% -23%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

56.7 (32.8min) fps ∼41% -59%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

114 fps ∼100% +8%

Average of class Gaming

  (22.1 – 171, n=93, last 2 years)

112 fps ∼98% +6%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

106 fps ∼93%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

74.2 fps ∼65% -30%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (51.6 – 106, n=9)

74.1 fps ∼65% -30%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

58.3 fps ∼51% -45%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

45.7 fps ∼40% -57%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

26.9 fps ∼24% -75%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

106 fps ∼100%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

88 fps ∼83% -17%

Average of class Gaming

  (15.4 – 131, n=116, last 2 years)

83.1 fps ∼78% -22%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (37.4 – 106, n=9)

56.2 fps ∼53% -47%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

53.1 fps ∼50% -50%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

40.8 fps ∼38% -62%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

33.1 fps ∼31% -69%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

26.9 fps ∼25% -75%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

114 fps ∼100%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (81.6 – 116, n=12)

94.5 fps ∼83% -17%

Average of class Gaming

  (14.8 – 143, n=184, last 2 years)

92.7 fps ∼81% -19%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

88.3 fps ∼77% -23%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

85.1 fps ∼75% -25%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

77.6 fps ∼68% -32%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

75.4 fps ∼66% -34%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

28.8 fps ∼25% -75%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

92.5 fps ∼100%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (68.4 – 92.5, n=12)

77.6 fps ∼84% -16%

Average of class Gaming

  (13.7 – 113, n=184, last 2 years)

76.7 fps ∼83% -17%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

75.7 fps ∼82% -18%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

71.5 fps ∼77% -23%

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

64.4 fps ∼70% -30%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

62.7 fps ∼68% -32%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

30.2 fps ∼33% -67%

Average of class Gaming

  (10.9 – 251, n=88, last 2 years)

171 fps ∼100% +116%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

163 (43.5min, 114P1) fps ∼95% +106%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

112 (80.3min, 82.9P1) fps ∼65% +41%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (79.2 – 114, n=9)

102 fps ∼60% +29%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

89.4 (64.6min, 67.3P1) fps ∼52% +13%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

79.2 (58.1min, 59.6P1) fps ∼46%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

33 fps ∼19% -58%

Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

154 (36.9min, 111P1) fps ∼100% +126%

Average of class Gaming

  (10.9 – 221, n=102, last 2 years)

151 fps ∼98% +122%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

97.5 (70.5min, 75.8P1) fps ∼63% +43%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (68 – 100, n=10)

88.7 fps ∼58% +30%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

76.7 (54min, 57.9P1) fps ∼50% +13%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

68 (49.8min, 52.8P1) fps ∼44%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

27 fps ∼18% -60%

Average of class Gaming

  (11.9 – 289, n=30, last 2 years)

153 fps ∼100% +63%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

122 (105min, 82P1) fps ∼80% +30%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (93.9 – 131, n=7)

111 fps ∼73% +18%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

97.1 (63min, 56P1) fps ∼63% +3%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

93.9 (82min, 55P1) fps ∼61%

Average of class Gaming

  (14.2 – 157, n=33, last 2 years)

90.3 fps ∼100% +92%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

62.3 (52min, 52P1) fps ∼69% +32%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

  (46.8 – 69, n=7)

56.7 fps ∼63% +20%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

47.1 (39min, 29P1) fps ∼52%

Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

46.8 (38min, 37P1) fps ∼52% -1%

In principle, you can still game on battery power, but you should keep in mind that performance drops a bit when the battery is below 50% (TGP is then only 26 instead of 35 watts). In our test with The Witcher 3, the frame rate drops from 37 to 27 FPS as a result, making the game look a bit choppier and requiring you to reduce the level of detail a bit. Either way, the battery runtime during gaming is very short at 47 minutes. Further gaming benchmarks are available in our Game Benchmarks article.

CPU and GPU data during our The Witcher 3 Ultra test
CPU and GPU data during our The Witcher 3 Ultra test

Asus uses a high-quality cooling solution for its gaming tablet, opting for liquid metal for the processor as well as vapor-chamber cooling with two fans. Considering the high performance, we’re positively surprised by the noise level. In everyday use, the device is usually completely silent, and the fans don’t run at all or are simply inaudible. Under load, however, the fans rev up quickly. As soon as you put the graphics card under load (e.g. when gaming), the noise level quickly reaches 41 dB(A), but it’s not bothersome at all. You can hear it in the background, but you can still play without issues and actually use the speakers for the game sound. If you only stress the processor (for example when using the XG Mobile eGPU), the ROG Flow Z13 remains even quieter at 37.5 dB(A). When the load ends, the fan speed is also reduced very quickly (gradually between 31.9 and 29.6 dB(A)), and they become inaudible again quickly as well. The optional Turbo mode doesn’t provide higher performance, but the noise level increases to around 44 dB(A). But as we’ll see in a moment, the temperatures aren’t critical at all anyway, so Turbo mode doesn’t really make sense.

We noticed some slight electronic noise in the synthetic GPU benchmarks, but there were no problems in actual games and everyday tasks.

Noise Level

Idle

24.5 / 24.5 / 24.5 dB(A)

Load
41 / 41 dB(A)
  red to green bar

 

30 dB

silent

40 dB(A)

audible

50 dB(A)

loud

 

min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.5 dB(A)

dB(A)0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.335.438.436.637.537.52533.83736.634.731.533.83126.633.933.630.924.228.64031.331.435.435.832.930.65033.432.635.332.529.434.36329.631.328.527.825.326.58023.928.429.526.4242210022.6232537.320.12212519.620.422.525.520.220.416018.718.42020.814.918.42002021.522.323.518.721.325020.420.726.824.418.519.631518.820.922.627.416.416.840019.921.330.324.714.415.55001819.927.428.312.814.463018.520.124.227.414.315.180019.421.725.928.511.712100020.223.128.531.71212.4125018.821.826.431.311.112.1160018.921.928.131.411.812.4200018.721.527.431.811.312.2250018.220.426.230.811.211.9315016.518.624.528.911.311.8400014.716.622.927.211.812.4500014.715.820.925.512.112.5630013.615.720.92512.112.7800012.81317.321.912.3131000012.812.714.318.812.4131250012.612.613.516.613.214.21600012.412.112.814.911.912.8SPL29.631.937.541.124.525.3N1.21.52.73.60.60.7median 18.7median 20.4median 24.2median 27.2median 12.3median 13Delta2.42.53.22.92.22.6hearing rangehide median Fan Noise {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784599_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_784599_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784599_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_784599_2’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784599_2’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_784599_3’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784599_3’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_784599_4’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784599_4’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_784599_5’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784599_5’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” style=”text-anchor:start;font-size:0.7em” x=”55″ y=”38″>Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784599_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” style=”stroke:rgb(255, 46, 46);stroke-width:2″ x1=”74.2″ x2=”90.2″ y1=”40″ y2=”56″> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784599_2’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” style=”stroke:rgb(255, 46, 46);stroke-width:2″ x1=”93.4″ x2=”109.4″ y1=”40″ y2=”56″> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784599_3’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” style=”stroke:rgb(255, 46, 46);stroke-width:2″ x1=”112.6″ x2=”128.6″ y1=”40″ y2=”56″> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784599_4’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” style=”stroke:rgb(255, 46, 46);stroke-width:2″ x1=”131.8″ x2=”147.8″ y1=”40″ y2=”56″> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784599_5’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” style=”stroke:rgb(255, 46, 46);stroke-width:2″ x1=”151″ x2=”167″ y1=”40″ y2=”56″>

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, R9 5980HS, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
off / environment *

24.5

24.3

1%

30.5

-24%

24.7

-1%

25.1

-2%

30.5

-24%

Idle Minimum *

24.5

24.3

1%

33.3

-36%

24.7

-1%

25.2

-3%

30.5

-24%

Idle Average *

24.5

24.3

1%

33.3

-36%

24.7

-1%

25.2

-3%

30.5

-24%

Idle Maximum *

24.5

25.9

-6%

33.3

-36%

24.7

-1%

25.2

-3%

32.1

-31%

Load Average *

41

43.3

-6%

36.1

12%

36.8

10%

31

24%

43

-5%

Witcher 3 ultra *

41

44.6

-9%

36.8

10%

44

-7%

42.8

-4%

Load Maximum *

41

49.5

-21%

48.6

-19%

43.8

-7%

51.7

-26%

41.3

-1%

* … smaller is better

Despite the fairly low noise level, the ROG Flow Z13 doesn’t get particularly warm during gaming, as we can register a maximum of around 44 °C (~111 °F) at the back here. Even in the stress test, there’s no point where the 50 °C (~122 °F) mark is exceeded. However, since you’ll hardly hold the tablet in your hand when gaming (demanding games), you won’t have any issues here. Moreover, the warm air is evacuated upwards, so it doesn’t become a bother. The case temperatures don’t even reach 30 °C (~86 °F) during everyday tasks.

The stress test reveals an interesting picture. The GPU performance is completely stable at 35 watts, but the processor always fluctuates between 23 and 55 watts after an initial peak consumption of 105 watts. The intervals with 55 watts become shorter after 20 minutes, which also explains the lower CPU temperatures beginning at this point. This CPU behavior was identical with all the performance modes of the Armoury Crate software, which means Asus should do some more work here, since we would prefer a constant CPU performance. There is no performance drop immediately after the test.

CPU and GPU data during the stress test
CPU and GPU data during the stress test
  44.9 °C

113 F
45.3 °C

114 F
44.7 °C

112 F
 
  40.6 °C

105 F
43 °C

109 F
42.8 °C

109 F
 
  37.5 °C

100 F
37.8 °C

100 F
37.5 °C

100 F
 
Maximum: 45.3 °C = 114 F

Average: 41.6 °C = 107 F
47.3 °C

117 F
48.3 °C

119 F
42 °C

108 F
46.2 °C

115 F
47 °C

117 F
43.2 °C

110 F
39.9 °C

104 F
41 °C

106 F
40.2 °C

104 F
Maximum: 48.3 °C = 119 F

Average: 43.9 °C = 111 F

Power Supply (max.)  50.2 °C = 122 F | Room Temperature 20.3 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.

(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.2 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.

(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.1 °C / 110 F

(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.

(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.

(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F.

(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-8.8 °C / -15.8 F).

Asus integrates two so-called Smart AMP speakers, which are located in the lower area of both sides and project sound to the sides. Despite the narrow case width, this actually creates a slight stereo effect, and the speakers offer a decent performance overall, but they simply lack force. This is also confirmed by our audio measurements. The microphones also do their job satisfactorily, but most gamers will probably use a headset anyway.

dB(A)0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.538.42531.535.93124.231.54032.930.95029.431.76325.328.8802428.610020.130.212520.235.316014.939.120018.748.425018.553.331516.459.540014.463.950012.861.163014.359.180011.758.910001260.7125011.166.4160011.865.8200011.369.5250011.266.5315011.364.2400011.864.8500012.163.6630012.161.2800012.356.91000012.459.71250013.264.61600011.949.9SPL24.576.6N0.637.9median 12.3median 60.7Delta2.26.231.929.529.631.626.927.727.626.423.526.523.430.222.232.220.644.520.25119.347.319.953.816.655.316.757.916.96113.363.112.264.811.167.812.968.611.170.112.372.611.573.811.57311.771.311.868.712.268.512.465.412.661.312.560.612.465.612.26224.781.90.650.3median 12.4median 64.82.35.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784598_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_784598_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784598_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” style=”text-anchor:start;font-size:0.7em” x=”55″ y=”38″>Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_784598_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” style=”stroke:rgb(255, 46, 46);stroke-width:2″ x1=”74.2″ x2=”90.2″ y1=”40″ y2=”56″> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_762426_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_762426_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_762426_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” style=”text-anchor:start;font-size:0.7em” x=”313.4″ y=”38″>Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_762426_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” style=”stroke:rgb(255, 46, 46);stroke-width:2″ x1=”332.6″ x2=”348.6″ y1=”40″ y2=”56″>

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)

Bass 100 – 315 Hz

(-) | nearly no bass – on average 16.4% lower than median

(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)

Mids 400 – 2000 Hz

(+) | balanced mids – only 3.3% away from median

(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)

Highs 2 – 16 kHz

(+) | balanced highs – only 3.1% away from median

(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)

Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz

(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)

Compared to same class

» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 64% worse

» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%

Compared to all devices tested

» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse

» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)

Bass 100 – 315 Hz

(±) | reduced bass – on average 13.1% lower than median

(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)

Mids 400 – 2000 Hz

(+) | balanced mids – only 4.3% away from median

(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)

Highs 2 – 16 kHz

(+) | balanced highs – only 4.4% away from median

(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)

Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz

(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)

Compared to same class

» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse

» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Compared to all devices tested

» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse

» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

When you look at the power consumption of the processor, and then consider the dedicated GPU and the rest of the components, you will quickly notice that the included 100-watt power adapter is not enough to cover the power demand during peak loads. In the stress test, we measured a maximum consumption of 103 watts at the beginning because the power adapter simply doesn’t supply more. The remaining ~40-50 watts are drawn from the battery in these situations, which can also be seen in the following graph of the battery charge in our stress test. With the processor quickly being limited to 55 watts (+35 watts dGPU and rest of system), we’re still at a measured consumption of 103 watts, and the battery is still being used a bit. So the limitation is solely down to the device’s power adapter; the cooling system could certainly handle more (e.g. a more powerful version of the graphics card).

As we saw in the stress test, the processor’s TDP always fluctuates cyclically, and analogously, the power consumption also fluctuates between 80-103 watts in the stress test. After about 20 minutes in the stress test, the periods during which the processor runs at 55 watts become shorter, which is why the battery charge increases again. Since the battery is only “drained” during load spikes or only very briefly, this doesn’t have an impact on the device’s operation, but whether this is beneficial for the battery’s lifespan is another story.

The idle rates are also quite high, which is due to the high screen brightness. The standby consumption of 2.5 watts is definitely too high; Asus should make improvements here.

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK, IPS, 1920×1200, 13.40
Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880×1800, 14.00
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, IPS, 2560×1440, 14.00
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, IPS, 2880×1920, 13.00
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 2560×1440, 14.00
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

R9 5980HS, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00, IPS, 3840×2400, 13.40
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU

 
Average of class Gaming

 
Idle Minimum *

8.8

6.7

24%

8.1

8%

3.9

56%

9.4

-7%

7.4

16%

11 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(5 – 23, n=11)

-25%

13.7 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(2 – 62, n=165, last 2 years)

-56%

Idle Average *

12.1

12.6

-4%

12.9

-7%

8.5

30%

15.8

-31%

10.3

15%

15.9 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(9 – 25, n=11)

-31%

18.2 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(6 – 68.2, n=165, last 2 years)

-50%

Idle Maximum *

12.7

15.4

-21%

16.1

-27%

9.8

23%

24.1

-90%

13.4

-6%

19.9 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(10.8 – 30, n=11)

-57%

26.5 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(8.7 – 72.5, n=164, last 2 years)

-109%

Load Average *

72.3

85.7

-19%

102.4

-42%

48

34%

76.8

-6%

75.9

-5%

90.9 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(65.8 – 106, n=11)

-26%

108 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(55.1 – 183, n=166, last 2 years)

-49%

Witcher 3 ultra *

77.3

83

-7%

41.5

46%

154

-99%

Load Maximum *

103.1

110.9

-8%

135.8

-32%

63

39%

189.7

-84%

78

24%

139 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(103 – 172, n=11)

-35%

216 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(103 – 512, n=166, last 2 years)

-110%

* … smaller is better

0102030405060708090100Tooltip

; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø77.3 (75.3-87.5)

; 1280×720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø95.6 (80.9-103)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip

; Prime95 V28,10 Stress (external Monitor): Ø93.8 (89.8-103)

; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (103-103)

; 1280×720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø78.5 (76.2-81.7)

; 1920×1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø81.4 (79.7-86.9)

Charging process
Charging process

The combination of the 56 Wh battery and the comparatively high consumption rates doesn’t augur particularly long battery runtimes, and this is also confirmed by our tests. With an adjusted brightness of 150 cd/m² (corresponds to 35% of the maximum brightness in our test device), we get 5:30 to 6 hours in Wi-Fi or video mode. In contrast, our Wi-Fi test only runs for a bit over 4 hours at maximum brightness. By the way, the 120 Hz mode doesn’t affect runtimes in our tests. In view of these results, we wouldn’t recommend the optional 4K panel since it is likely to consume even more power.

A full charge takes around 100 minutes with the device turned on, but 50% of the capacity is available again after just under 28 minutes.

Battery Runtime

Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
0h 47min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 98)
5h 38min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 98)
4h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 12min

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE

i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 56 Wh
Schenker Vision 14 H35 RTX 3050 Ti

i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 53 Wh
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC

R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7

i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 51.5 Wh
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070

R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH

R9 5980HS, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 62 Wh
Average of class Gaming

 
Reader / Idle

1144

828

623

593 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(73 – 1399, n=124, last 2 years)

H.264

358

405

13%

616

72%

604

69%

411

15%

389 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(92 – 860, n=65, last 2 years)

9%

WiFi v1.3

338

327

-3%

674

99%

456

35%

439

30%

347

3%

350 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(61 – 710, n=169, last 2 years)

4%

Witcher 3 ultra

47

74.4 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(46 – 131, n=9, last 2 years)

58%

Load

72

86

19%

161

124%

70

-3%

79

10%

107

49%

91.4 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?(30 – 243, n=145, last 2 years)

27%

Pros

+ sturdy and high-quality case with lighting included

+ very high CPU performance

+ good 120 Hz IPS touchscreen

+ very effective and quiet cooling

+ eGPU connection with 8 PCIe lanes

Cons

– slowest version of the RTX 3050 Ti

– power adapter lacks capacity

– Thunderbolt 4 without charging function

– USB 2.0

In review: Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE. Test device provided by Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE. Test device provided by Asus Germany.

The new Asus ROG Flow Z13 is a gaming tablet and a convertible that is currently quite unrivaled on the market. After our review, the impression is predominantly positive. Besides a very fast Alder Lake CPU and stable gaming performance, especially the cooling system is surprisingly effective and quiet. You can use the integrated speakers without any issues while gaming. The 1200p display in the 16:10 format also impresses with good color reproduction and high brightness. Since the battery runtimes aren’t particularly long as it is, we wouldn’t recommend the optional 4K panel.

However, there are also some points where there’s room for improvement. For starters, the CPU/GPU combination is relatively unbalanced, as a high-end i9 CPU is combined with the slowest version of the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti. The Core i9 offers extremely high performance, especially during short load peaks and single-core benchmarks, but the Core i7-12700H would offer the same performance in everyday use, particularly once the power limit kicks in at 55 watts. Furthermore, the processor requires up to 114 watts during load peaks, and the device has to resort to the battery in addition to the 100-watt power adapter to provide enough energy. With the optional XG Mobile eGPU (either with the RTX 3080 or RX 6850M XT), the graphics performance can be increased drastically, and thanks to the good CPU performance, the tablet will not get bottlenecked here, either. In this respect, the configuration with the Core i5 and the iGPU is also interesting, but unfortunately, it’s not offered in all regions.

Finally a proper gaming tablet: Asus offers a powerful gaming tablet with good cooling with the ROG Flow Z13. However, the Alder Lake Core i9 processor is a bit overkill, and we would have preferred to see a faster version of the RTX 3050 Ti.

There’s also room for improvement in terms of the configuration. Besides modern interfaces like PCIe 4.0 and Thunderbolt 4, a slow USB 2.0 port somehow found its way into the Flow Z13. Furthermore, there’s a problem with supplying power via the Thunderbolt 4 port in German models. We are in contact with the manufacturer here and will update the review as soon as we receive an official statement. Furthermore, the additional profiles of the Armoury Crate software don’t really add any value at the moment; Asus should take another look here.

Finally, there’s the price in Germany, which is not low at 2,100 Euros ($1,899 in the United States). The bundle with the XG Mobile eGPU (RTX 3080) even costs an impressive 3,500 Euros (~$3,920, not currently available in the US). For this price, powerful gaming laptops like the Razer Blade 14 are already available, and you can also buy a normal tablet for on-the-go use. Users who occasionally play games at home can also use almost any convertible, such as the Surface Pro 8, for example, with a Thunderbolt port connected to an external GPU, despite the fact that the CPU performance is certainly not as high.

At the time of writing, you can find the Asus ROG Flow Z13 with the Core i9 processor, the RTX 3050 Ti, 16 GB of RAM, a 1 TB SSD, and the Full HD display for $1,899 on Best Buy.

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE – 02/25/2022 v7

Andreas Osthoff

Connectivity

66 / 80 → 83%

Application Performance

96%

Gaming – Weighted Average

94c5cafeb2cf49788145cebd51d98ef7

Andreas Osthoff

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff – Managing Editor Business Laptops – 1363 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

I grew up with modern consumer electronics and my first computer was a Commodore C64, which encouraged my interest in building my own systems. I started working as a review editor for Notebookcheck during my dual studies at Siemens. Currently, I am mainly responsible for dealing with business laptops and mobile workstations. It’s a great experience to be able to review the latest devices and technologies and then compare them with each other.

Stephanie Chamberlain

Translator: Stephanie Chamberlain – Translator – 504 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

I’ve been fascinated with technology ever since I got my very first Android smartphone, which was quite a while ago. The power packed into such a small footprint still amazes me. Learning to program made my understanding of technology deeper, and at the same time, it expanded my interest to the area of desktop computers and laptops. All this led me to enjoy reading and watching reviews of new devices, and that’s how I stumbled upon Notebookcheck. I immediately found their reviews to be very comprehensive, and luckily, I’ve even had the chance of translating them since 2019. When it comes to the huge field of technology, I’m currently also interested in specializing in Java programming.

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-03- 1 (Update: 2022-03- 1)

Snohomish County News Now

© 2021 Snohomish County News Now

Navigate Site

  • Disclosure
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
  • CCPA
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Contact
  • About

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • DMCA Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclosure
  • CCPA
  • Terms of Use

© 2021 Snohomish County News Now

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT